SIDEBAR
»
S
I
D
E
B
A
R
«
The iGouge
Jan 20th, 2007 by scaredpoet

Okay, more iPhone ranting.

It’s normally standard practice in the US for wireless mobile carriers to lock people into two-year contracts known as “service commitments,” in which a customer pledges to stick with that carrier for one or two years, in exchange for a discount on a phone. This is often how these carriers can offer “free” or outrageously cheap phones and still make money; the idea being that in exchange for a deep discount on a shiny and slick new handset, you’ll keep paying your bills every month to that carrier so that they can recoup the real cost of the phone over time. If you leave early and break the contract, the cell company charges you an “Early Termination Fee,” which can run between $150 and $200.
This practice is known in the cell phone world as a “subsidy.” It is also part of the reason why most phones in the US that carry a wireless company’s brand cannot be transferred to another cell company. Most have placed what is known as a subsidy lock on the equipment, to ensure that no one can take that “free” phone and use it somewhere else.
Makes sense, right? Most people in the US either can’t or won’t fork over several hundred bucks for a cell phone, so in excahnge for being locked into a contract for a while, the cell company eats part or all of the cost of the phone. A fair deal… or, is it?

Well, according to one research firm, that’s definitely not the case with the iPhone.

When it launches this June, the iPhone will cost $499 for the 2GB model and $599 for the 4GB model, with that same 2 year contract that everyone else is locked into. Quite pricey for something that requires a contract, isn’t it? So, the cost to make this phone, with all the whizbangs it’s supposed to offer, must be outrageous! Given Cingular’s standard $200 termination fee, you’d think the real cost for this phone must be in the $700 to $800 range!

Well, a company known as iSuppli makes it’s living doing something I wish I could do: take apart new gadgets, find out what makes them tick, and then calculate the cost of manufacturing that device. While no one outside of Apple has been able to dismantle an iPhone yet, iSuppli has made some educated guesses on that what might go into making one, and according to what they told Wireless Week, the iPhone is suprisingly cheap to make!

iSuppli estimates the 4 Gb version of the iPhone will carry a $229.85 hardware bill of material (BoM) and manufacturing cost and a $245.83 total expense, yielding a 50.7% margin on each unit sold at the $499 retail price. The 8 Gb iPhone will sport a $264.85 hardware cost and a $280.83 total expense, amounting to a 53.1% margin at the $599 retail price.

So let’s get this straight: For each iPhone sold, Cingular (or rather, “the new AT&T“) and Apple will get to divvy up over $250 in pure profit. And that’s all fine and good! After all businesses are, well, in the business of making money. But even with such a wide profit margin, Cingular still wants to lock people into a two-year contract, and still intends to charge people a termination fee if they leave early.

Uhm, why?

Cingular certainly can’t argue that they’re taking a hit on this phone. They’d be making money hand over fist! So, if there’s no “gadget welfare” going on here, then the only justification (if you can call it that) for locking people into their service agreements is simply because they can.

It’s interesting to see that Cingular, being rebranded as “the new AT&T” is going back to AT&T’s old ways. What’s next? Will “the new AT&T” start preventing people from buying any phones at all, and instead force people to rent them like in the old days?

Well, Sun has sued Apple over the iPhone trademark, so it may end up not being called this. Maybe the “iGouge” is a more fitting name after all.

iPhone’s glaring omission
Jan 9th, 2007 by scaredpoet

So, Apple has dropped a bombshell with the iPhone, claiming to have re-invented the Phone. And while the slick photos and stats look really, really sweet, there’s just one little problem that I see:

edge

I saw this image, and the sound of tires coming to a screeching halt played in my head, and my instant love affair with this phone was dashed.

EDGE?! This phone is going to use EDGE? Does Apple really intend to make what could be the Ferrari of wireless phones to use the cellular equivalent of a one lane dirt road when much cheaper phones are using true 3G, high-speed wireless data networks?!

Why not have it use EVDO? Or failing that, why not incorporate Cingular’s future: HSDPA and UMTS? While yes, the iPhone will have WiFi capability, the whole POINT of having a smartphone like this is to be able to take advantage of a high speed cellular wireless network even when you’re not near a Starbucks or other WiFi hotspot. And yet, Apple is taking what could be an Awesome Thing that’s Way Ahead of It’s Time and will make it run on a network that’s yesterday’s news.  It’s shockingly shortsighted of Apple to launch a phone that would be state of the art in 2010, and yet equip it with a circa-2003 radio interface.. Apple, WHAT THE FUCK?!

I would HOPE Cingular wouldn’t be the only carrier through which Apple decides to offer this phone. However I’m still in shock that they only support EDGE. Apple needs this phone to run on a high speed network if they want users to be truly satisfied with it. This is the equivalent of launching it on Sprint, but making it run only on iDEN. Yech!
I REALLY hope that if/when a CDMA model comes out, they equip it for EVDO, and I would HOPE that would be revision A.

Until then, I don’t care WHAT that phone can do, it’s useless to me without high speed data.

Incidentally: This is my 600th article! Yay Me!

Robertson, the fearmonger (or, 2007 off to a bad start)
Jan 2nd, 2007 by scaredpoet

All right, what’s the deal with 2007?  This year has NOT gotten off to a good start at all.  Lots of notable people have started dropping like flies right around the new year.  Cities thought to be largely impervious to natural disaster were paralyzed, twice, by blizzards and storms.  UFOs are suddenly being spotted and reported in Chicago by credible sources.

And then, scum like Pat Robertson decide to do a little fearmongering to steal some headlines.  His prediction?  A gigantic terror attack will hit the US in 2007.  Millions are to be affected.  And this jerk is trying to paint himself a modern day right-wing Nostradamus:

Robertson said God told him about the impending tragedy during a recent prayer retreat.

God also said, he claims, that major cities and possibly millions of people will be affected by the attack, which should take place sometime after September.

Robertson suggested in January 2006 that God punished then-Israeli Prime Minister Ariel Sharon with a stroke for ceding Israeli-controlled land to the Palestinians.

The broadcaster predicted in January 2004 that President Bush would easily win re-election.

Bush won 51 percent of the vote that fall, beating Democratic Sen. John Kerry of Massachusetts.

Do these “predictions” make him a credible soothsayer?  Maybe if you want to believe in this guy, but  just keep in mind that he’s done pretty loopy things.  Read his bio, for instance. Pretty trippy stuff.  In 1979, he was preparing his Christian Broadcasting Network to televise Christ’s second coming, which he belived would happen right about then.  And he flubbed twice in predicting the date of the Tribulation, a bloody 7-year war that heralds the end of the world – one in the Fall of 1982, and again on April 29, 2000.  Of course, we’re all still here.  And it’s a damned shame he didn’t predict 9-11, isn’t it?

So what of this latest prediction?  Well, considering al Qaeda’s been plotting for a while and is quite determined to continue its war against America, the law of averages does seem to indicate that after 5+ years of relative calm in the “homeland,” we’re about due for something big to happen.  So it wouldn’t take a psychic to be right if something did go down in ’07.  Will it affect multiple cities and kill millions?  I certainly hope not.  If anything, I hope al Qaeda wouldn’t give Pat the satisfaction of being right.

So I doubt God would choose a bigoted asshole like Pat Robertson to send a message down.


»  Substance:WordPress   »  Rights: Creative Commons License